Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, at the interim stage, the petitioner made out a strong prima facie case that tax deduction at source was not attracted when Transferrable Development Rights certificates were issued in lieu of compensation under the relevant provisions.
Analysis: The Court found, at least prima facie, that the words "or by any other mode" in Section 194C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the corresponding words in Section 194LA, had to be read ejusdem generis with payment by cash, cheque, or draft. The Court further held, at this stage, that those provisions did not appear to cover issuance of TDR certificates in lieu of compensation. Support was drawn from Sections 194B and 194R, which specifically contemplate situations where payment is wholly or partly in kind, a feature absent from Sections 194C and 194LA.
Conclusion: The petitioner established a strong prima facie case for interim protection, and operation of the impugned order, demand notice, and penalty notice was stayed pending final disposal of the writ petition.