Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
The Appellate Tribunal (ITAT Delhi) in the appeal for AY 2012-13 against the CIT(A)/NFAC order under section 147 read with section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, addressed the validity of the reassessment order dated 02.12.2019. The key issue was that the Assessing Officer did not issue a mandatory notice under section 143(2) before finalizing the reassessment under section 144 r.w.s. 147. This procedural lapse was undisputed by the Revenue. Relying on the Supreme Court decision in ACIT Vs. Hotel Blue Moon (2010) 321 ITR 362 (SC), the Tribunal held the reassessment order invalid and quashed it. Consequently, all other merits were rendered academic, and the appeal was allowed.