TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal dismissed for unexplained 471-day delay and prior rejection; dismissal upheld on delay and merits grounds under relevant rules.</h1> <h3>THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PORT) Versus M/s HATCOM AGRO (P) LIMITED</h3> THE COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PORT) Versus M/s HATCOM AGRO (P) LIMITED - TMI The Supreme Court, through Hon'ble Justices Manoj Misra and Ujjal Bhuyan, dismissed the present appeal on grounds of both delay and merits. The Court noted a prior judgment dated 09.05.2025 in Civil Appeal Diary No. 16116/2025 and connected appeals, where a 'gross delay of 471 days' was found and no sufficient explanation was provided. That earlier appeal was dismissed 'on the ground of delay as well as on merits,' with the Court declining to interfere with the impugned order dated 12-10-2023 by the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata. The appellant in the current case failed to dispute the prior dismissal. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal citing a delay of 305 days and affirmed the merits-based rejection. Pending applications, if any, were disposed of.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
