Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether disallowance under section 14A could be sustained in the absence of recorded satisfaction by the Assessing Officer, and whether the assessee's suo motu disallowance was to be retained.
Analysis: The assessee had earned exempt dividend income and offered a suo motu disallowance. The Assessing Officer enhanced the disallowance by applying Rule 8D, but no satisfaction was recorded to show why the assessee's computation was incorrect or why section 14A read with Rule 8D had to be invoked. In the absence of such satisfaction, the statutory precondition for making the higher disallowance was not met.
Conclusion: The addition made under section 14A read with Rule 8D was deleted, while the assessee's own disallowance of Rs. 1,96,311 was sustained.