Surcharge on income must follow Finance Act slab rates, not Maximum Marginal Rate, for incomes between Rs. 50L and Rs. 1Cr

The ITAT Mumbai held that the surcharge on the assessee's income must be determined according to the slab rates prescribed in the Finance Act for the relevant year, not at the Maximum Marginal Rate. Since the assessee's income exceeds Rs. 50 lakhs but does not exceed Rs. 1 crore, a 10% surcharge is applicable. The AO was directed to recompute the surcharge accordingly.

---

---

ISSUES:

Whether the surcharge on tax computed at Maximum Marginal Rate (MMR) for a private discretionary trust should be levied at the highest slab rate of 37% or at the slab rate applicable under the Finance Act for the relevant income bracket.Whether the proviso limiting the surcharge on dividend income and income under sections 111A, 112A to a maximum of 15% applies when tax is computed at MMR.Interpretation of Section 2(29C) of the Income Tax Act in conjunction with the Finance Act's First Schedule regarding the computation of surcharge on income tax for trusts taxed at MMR.

RULINGS / HOLDINGS:

The surcharge applicable on tax computed at Maximum Marginal Rate (MMR) for private discretionary trusts must be determined "depending upon the slab rate prescribed in the finance and not at the highest rate" as per the relevant Finance Act's First Schedule.The proviso under the heading 'Surcharge on income-tax' restricting the surcharge rate on dividend income and income under sections 111A, 112A to not exceed 15% is applicable and must be respected, thereby preventing surcharge exceeding 15% on such income.The expression "including surcharge on income-tax, if any," in Section 2(29C) of the Act must be read in conjunction with the computation mechanism provided under the Finance Act, and not as an automatic application of the highest surcharge rate irrespective of income slab.Applying the highest surcharge rate of 37% regardless of income slab would render the graded surcharge slabs and provisos meaningless and lead to an absurd and unworkable interpretation.For an income exceeding Rs. 50 lakhs but not exceeding Rs. 1 crore, the surcharge rate applicable on the tax computed at MMR is 10%, as prescribed in the Finance Act.

RATIONALE:

The Court applied the statutory framework of Section 2(29C) (definition of Maximum Marginal Rate), Section 164 and 167B (taxation of private discretionary trusts), and the First Schedule of the Finance Act specifying surcharge rates by income slabs.The Court relied on a Special Bench decision which clarified that surcharge rates must align with the slab rates prescribed in the Finance Act rather than applying the highest surcharge rate mechanically when tax is computed at MMR.The Court emphasized the constitutional requirement that surcharge can only be levied if authorized by law, referencing Articles 265 and 271 of the Constitution of India, thus underscoring the necessity of adhering to the Finance Act's prescribed surcharge slabs.The Court rejected the revenue's argument that the words "if any" in Section 2(29C) imply surcharge is only included when applicable, holding instead that the phrase must be read harmoniously with the Finance Act's surcharge computation provisions to avoid absurdity.The Court noted that prior decisions relied upon by the revenue did not directly address the issue of surcharge rate computation on tax at MMR for trusts, distinguishing those precedents and affirming the correctness of the Special Bench's approach.The Court's interpretation avoids rendering the graded surcharge slabs and provisos otiose and ensures surcharge is computed in a manner consistent with legislative intent and statutory scheme.

---