Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the disallowance of input tax credit under Section 16(2)(c) and Section 16(4) of the CGST/SGST Acts was liable to be interfered with and the assessee afforded an opportunity to produce supporting documents.
Analysis: The disallowance arose from the assessee's inability to trace the suppliers concerned. The Court found that the case stood on similar footing to an earlier decision of the same Court in which further opportunity had been granted to produce documents relating to the disputed transactions. On that basis, the assessee was entitled to a similar limited opportunity in the light of the circulars referred to in M. Trade Links. The impugned assessment was therefore interfered with only to the extent necessary to permit production and verification of the relevant materials.
Conclusion: The disallowance of input tax credit was set aside to a limited extent, and the assessee was permitted to produce the required documents within the stipulated time, after which the assessing authority was to complete the assessment accordingly.
Final Conclusion: The petitioner obtained partial relief on the input tax credit dispute, with the assessment kept alive only to the extent necessary for fresh verification of documents.
Ratio Decidendi: Where disallowance of input tax credit is based on non-traceability of suppliers, a limited opportunity may be granted to produce supporting documents before final assessment is sustained.