Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in a demand of service tax on alleged Tour Operator Service.
Analysis: Liability to service tax under the definition of tour operator depended on the vehicle answering the description of a tourist vehicle under the Motor Vehicles law. The applicants contended that their vehicles were only contract carriages and had not been constructed, adapted, equipped, or maintained to satisfy the prescribed requirements for tourist vehicles. That position was not disputed by the Revenue. The request for pre-deposit was also supported by the Tribunal's earlier view that tax liability would arise only where the contract carriage fulfilled the requirements of a tourist vehicle under the Motor Vehicles Rules.
Conclusion: The applicants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending the appeal.
Final Conclusion: Interim relief was granted and the recovery proceedings remained stayed during the pendency of the appeal.
Ratio Decidendi: Service tax on tour operator service attaches only when the contract carriage satisfies the statutory requirements of a tourist vehicle under the applicable motor vehicle rules.