Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ petition challenging the appellate order should be disposed of by permitting the petitioner to avail the statutory second appeal before the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal upon its constitution, and whether the statutory stay under the GST law would continue till disposal of such appeal.
Analysis: The petition was filed against an appellate order under Section 107 of the Chhattisgarh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 in circumstances where the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal had been notified but its President or Members had not yet assumed office. The Court took note of the Central Board's order clarifying the computation of limitation for appeals under the GST appellate framework when the Tribunal is not functional, and also relied upon the coordinate bench decision dealing with the same issue. In view of these factors, the Court found it appropriate to allow the petitioner to invoke the statutory appellate remedy after the President or State President enters office, subject to the required statutory deposit. The Court further directed that the appeal, once filed, be decided in accordance with law and that the statutory stay under Section 112(9) would remain operative till disposal of the appeal.
Conclusion: The writ petition was disposed of by directing the petitioner to pursue the statutory second appeal when the Tribunal becomes functional, with the interim statutory protection to continue till the appeal is decided.