Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
The Delhi High Court, in a hybrid hearing, addressed the petitioner's contention that Section 122(1A) of the CGST Act, effective from 1st January 2021, cannot impose penalties for transactions predating this provision. The petitioner relied on the Bombay High Court's decision in Amit Manilal Haria v. The Joint Commissioner of CGST & CE & Ors. The Court noted that the taxable person, M/s. Sanskriti EXIM Private Limited, had challenged the show cause notice via W.P.(C) 929/2025 and sought to include the impugned order therein. The Court ordered tagging the writ petition with the present case and listed the matter for further hearing alongside similar petitions concerning the "question of taxable person." The Court issued notice to respondents, directed filing of counter affidavits by 15th July 2025, and restrained any coercive action against the petitioner pending further orders.