Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the rectification application could be entertained in the absence of any error apparent on the face of the original assessment order.
Analysis: The assessment had been made after issuance of a show cause notice and no reply had been filed. The grievance raised in rectification concerned factual matters arising from mismatch in returns, which required examination at the stage of assessment and not in rectification proceedings. Rectification is confined to patent errors in the original order and cannot be used to reopen factual controversies.
Conclusion: The rectification order did not call for interference and the challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition was dismissed, and the connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.
Ratio Decidendi: Rectification can be invoked only for an error apparent on the face of the record, and not for adjudication of factual issues that ought to have been raised in the assessment proceedings.