ITAT Upholds Deletion of Additions Based on Speculative CCTV Evidence and Confirms Proper Sales Recording Under Section 69C

The ITAT Mumbai upheld the deletion of additions made for alleged undisclosed sales and unexplained stock transfer. The AO's reliance on CCTV footage from a single day to extrapolate sales suppression over the year was deemed speculative and lacked a reasonable basis. Documentary evidence, including cash books and sales registers, showed sales were properly recorded. Regarding the 27 kg gold stock transfer, the assessee reconciled transfers through invoices and statutory declarations, with no corroborative evidence from tax authorities or reliable witnesses to prove otherwise. The AO's contradictory acceptance of Mumbai HO books but rejection of Cuttack branch books was criticized. The CIT(A) rightly found the additions to be based on conjecture without cogent evidence and ruled in favor of the assessee.

---

---

ISSUES:

Whether the addition made on account of undisclosed sales based on extrapolation of a single day's CCTV footage and other material was justified.Whether the addition made on account of unexplained stock transfer of gold jewellery from branch office to head office was justified.Whether the books of accounts maintained for the branch office could be rejected without specific defects.Whether estimation of sales turnover and profit based on assumptions without corroborative evidence is permissible.

RULINGS / HOLDINGS:

The addition on account of undisclosed sales was deleted as the estimation based on a single day CCTV footage extrapolated to the entire year was "merely based on conjecture and surmises without any cogent evidence" and lacked "any rational or reasonable basis."The addition on account of unexplained stock transfer of 27 kgs. of gold jewellery was deleted because the claim of stock transfer was supported by statutory declaration Form F, invoice-wise reconciliation, and acceptance of the corresponding entries in the head office books, and the sole contradictory statement of the employee was not reliable.The books of accounts maintained for the branch office could not be rejected without pointing out "any specific defects," and mere reliance on statements and CCTV footage was insufficient for rejection.Estimation of sales turnover and profit requires "corroborative evidence" and cannot be made solely on assumptions such as average invoice value, number of transactions, or static gold rates; such estimation was held to be unacceptable.

RATIONALE:

The court applied the principle that additions or estimations of undisclosed income must be based on "cogent evidence" and not on "conjecture and surmises." Reliance on a single day's CCTV footage without corroborative evidence or enquiry into customer transactions was deemed insufficient and arbitrary.The statutory framework requires maintenance of proper books of account under the Income Tax Act, and rejection of such books demands specific defects or discrepancies; mere suspicion or isolated statements do not justify rejection.The acceptance of stock transfers recorded in the books of account of the head office and supported by statutory declarations under sales tax law was a key factor; the court emphasized consistency and the principle that transactions are "two sides of the same coin."The court noted that reliance solely on an employee's contradictory statement, especially when contradicted by airline travel records and absence of evidence of check-in baggage, was insufficient to discredit the stock transfer claim.The decision reflects adherence to the requirement that assessments and additions must be based on "materials and evidences available on record," reinforcing the protection against arbitrary or speculative tax assessments.

---