TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Writ petition challenging anti-dumping duty levy under Rule 18 dismissed as infructuous after notification issued</h1> <h3>Rampada Pradhan Versus Designated Authority, Directorate General of Trade Remedies and others</h3> Rampada Pradhan Versus Designated Authority, Directorate General of Trade Remedies and others - TMI The Calcutta High Court, presided by Raja Basu Chowdhury, addressed a writ petition challenging the final findings of the Designated Authority under Rule 18 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995. The Court noted the publication of the final notification levying anti-dumping duty dated 19th June, 2025. Consequently, the petition seeking to challenge these findings was held to have become 'infructuous.' Both counsel for respondent no. 1 and the domestic industry concurred with the publication of the notification. The Court accordingly dismissed the writ petition as infructuous, while incorporating the appearance of counsel for respondent no. 2 in a prior order.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
