1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Supreme Court dismisses Department's appeal after rejecting 979-day delay condonation for lack of adequate justification</h1> The SC dismissed the petitioner/Department's appeal that sought condonation of a 979-day delay in filing. The HC had earlier rejected the appeal, finding ... Delay filling appeal - appeal filed by the petitioner/Department was dismissed by the High Court finding no justification for condonation of delay of 979 days in filing thereof - HELD THAT:- We do not find any error in the order passed by the High Court. Application for condonation of delay as well as the Special Leave Petition are, accordingly, dismissed. The Supreme Court, in a bench comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Mahadevan, dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner/Department. The High Court's refusal to condone a delay of 979 days in filing the appeal was upheld, with the Court stating, 'We do not find any error in the order passed by the High Court.' Consequently, both the application for condonation of delay and the Special Leave Petition were dismissed, and all pending applications were disposed of.