TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Section 148 reassessment notice for AY 2015-16 quashed as time-barred under section 149(1) limitation period</h1> <h3>M/s. H.A. Share And Brokers Pvt. Ltd. Versus ITO, Ward 11 (1) & Ors.</h3> The Delhi HC quashed a notice issued under section 148 for reassessment proceedings. The notice dated 27.07.2022 for AY 2015-16 was issued beyond the ... Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - limitation periods under the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 (TOLA) - notice was premised on the provisions relating to reassessment as were in force prior to 31.03.2021 - HELD THAT:- The notice issued u/s 148 of the Act stands quashed and set aside. Concededly, the controversy is covered in favour of the Assessee by the decision of this court in Makemytrip India Pvt. Ltd.[2025 (4) TMI 46 - DELHI HIGH COURT] wherein the impugned notice was issued on 27.07.2022, which was admittedly beyond the period of limitation as prescribed under Section 149 (1). Since TOLA was not applicable in respect of the said notices u/s 148 of the Act for AY 2015-16 as conceded by the Revenue in the case of Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal [2024 (10) TMI 264 - SUPREME COURT (LB)], thus the impugned notice is liable to be set aside. ISSUES: Whether notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, after 31.03.2021 but without following the procedure prescribed under Section 148A, are valid. Whether reassessment proceedings initiated pursuant to notices issued on or after 01.04.2021 for AY 2015-16 are maintainable in light of the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 (TOLA) and related Supreme Court decisions. Whether the concession made by the Revenue before the Supreme Court in Union of India & Ors. v. Rajeev Bansal affects the validity of reassessment notices issued for AY 2015-16 after 01.04.2021. Whether the reassessment order passed under Section 147 read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for AY 2015-16 pursuant to the impugned notices is sustainable. RULINGS / HOLDINGS: The notices dated 30.06.2021 and 22.07.2022 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, without following the procedure under Section 148A post 31.03.2021, are invalid as the procedure prescribed under Section 148A must be followed for notices issued after that date. The reassessment notices issued on or after 01.04.2021 for AY 2015-16 are required to be dropped as per the Revenue's concession in Union of India & Ors. v. Rajeev Bansal, since such notices 'will not fall for completion during the period prescribed under TOLA.' The impugned reassessment order dated 15.05.2023 passed under Section 147 read with Section 144B of the Act is set aside as it is predicated on invalid notices and proceedings. The reassessment proceedings initiated pursuant to the impugned notices for AY 2015-16 are quashed in view of the binding Supreme Court concession and consistent judicial precedent, including this Court's decision in Makemytrip India Pvt. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax. RATIONALE: The Court applied the statutory framework under the Income Tax Act, 1961, specifically Sections 147, 148, 148A, and 144B, as amended by the Finance Act 2021 and interpreted in light of the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 (TOLA). The Supreme Court's decision in Union of India & Ors. v. Rajeev Bansal clarified that for AY 2015-16, reassessment notices issued on or after 01.04.2021 must be dropped as they do not fall within the limitation period prescribed under TOLA, and this concession was binding on the Revenue. The Court relied on the principle that the procedure under Section 148A is mandatory for notices issued after 31.03.2021, and failure to comply renders such notices invalid. The decision in Deepak Steel and Power Ltd. v. Central Board of Direct Taxes reaffirmed the binding nature of the Revenue's concession and the necessity to quash reassessment notices issued beyond the permissible limitation period under TOLA. The Court noted no dissent or doctrinal shift but followed the binding precedents and concessions by the Revenue to uphold the petitioner's challenge.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
