Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether dismissal of the appeal as time-barred attracted the doctrine of merger; (ii) whether the assessment order under section 73 of the GST Act was liable to be quashed for want of opportunity of hearing under section 75(4) of the GST Act.
Issue (i): Whether dismissal of the appeal as time-barred attracted the doctrine of merger.
Analysis: The appeal against the order dated 04.12.2023 had been dismissed on limitation and not on merits. A dismissal for want of limitation does not result in merger of the original order with the appellate order.
Conclusion: The doctrine of merger did not apply to the dismissal of the appeal as time-barred.
Issue (ii): Whether the assessment order under section 73 of the GST Act was liable to be quashed for want of opportunity of hearing under section 75(4) of the GST Act.
Analysis: The record disclosed that no notice of hearing had been issued and no opportunity of hearing had been afforded before passing the assessment order. In the absence of such hearing, the order was contrary to the mandatory requirement of section 75(4) of the GST Act.
Conclusion: The assessment order was unsustainable for breach of the requirement of hearing and was liable to be set aside.
Final Conclusion: The petition succeeded on the limited ground of denial of hearing, the impugned orders were quashed, and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after affording an opportunity of hearing.
Ratio Decidendi: An assessment order passed without affording the statutorily required opportunity of hearing is liable to be set aside, and dismissal of an appeal as time-barred does not attract the doctrine of merger.