Appeal dismissed: additional customs duty on imported brass and copper scrap quashed for lack of contemporaneous LME-based evidence

SC dismissed the appeal and upheld the Tribunal's order quashing additional customs duty on imported brass and copper scrap. The Court found the adjudicating authority relied on LME prices without any contemporaneous import data or other material to support those rates, and the Revenue failed to rebut the Tribunal's observation that no such evidence had been placed before it. In absence of supporting contemporaneous material, the SC found no merit in the demand and dismissed the appeal.

---

---

Issues:
- Determination of imported goods price based on Transaction value or LME Prices

Analysis:
1. Issue: Determination of imported goods price
- The appeal under Section 130-E of the Customs Act, 1962 raised the question of whether to accept the Transaction value declared by the importer or determine the price of imported goods based on LME Prices.
- The respondent filed Bills of Entry for Brass Scrap and Copper Scrap, cleared at declared invoice values. Subsequently, additional duty was demanded based on LME prices exceeding the declared prices.

2. Facts and Tribunal's decision:
- The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the additional duty demanded from the respondent. The Tribunal noted the lack of contemporaneous material supporting the enhanced prices declared by the revenue.
- The Tribunal emphasized that the assessment based solely on LME Bulletin without corroborative evidence of imports at similar prices was impermissible under the law.

3. Revenue's argument and Supreme Court's decision:
- The revenue contended that the LME bulletin accurately reflected international metal prices, justifying the adoption of prices notified by LME for customs duty determination.
- The Supreme Court, however, disagreed with the revenue's stance. It highlighted the absence of details on contemporaneous imports or materials indicating LME prices in the adjudication order or presented before the Tribunal.
- As the revenue failed to challenge the Tribunal's observations, the Supreme Court upheld the Tribunal's decision to set aside the additional duty demand against the assessee.

4. Conclusion:
- The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, finding it devoid of merit, and made no order as to costs. The judgment reaffirmed the necessity of providing substantiating evidence for customs duty determination, emphasizing the impermissibility of relying solely on LME prices without supporting material.

---