Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellate order, which merely affirmed the assessment without dealing with the merits and without passing a speaking order under section 250(6), should be set aside and the matter restored for fresh adjudication.
Analysis: The assessee did not appear before the appellate authority, but the order under challenge did not contain a discussion of the merits of the addition relating to cash deposits during demonetisation. The Tribunal noted that an appellate order under section 250(6) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 must be a reasoned and speaking order, even where the matter proceeds ex parte. In view of the absence of such adjudication, the issue required reconsideration on merits with an opportunity to place evidence and with liberty to call for a remand report.
Conclusion: The impugned appellate order was set aside and the matter was restored to the appellate authority for fresh decision in accordance with law; the assessee obtained a partial procedural relief.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only for statistical purposes, and the dispute was remitted for fresh appellate adjudication after providing reasonable opportunity to both sides.
Ratio Decidendi: An appellate authority must decide the appeal on merits by passing a speaking order under section 250(6) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, even in an ex parte proceeding.