Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Select multiple courts at once.
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Landlord cannot recover premises used as corporate debtor's registered office during insolvency moratorium period</h1> The SC dismissed appeals in a case involving recovery of premises used as registered office of a corporate debtor by landlord during CIRP moratorium. The ... Recovery of premises being used as Registered Office of the corporate debtor, by the landlord JOML during the subsistence of moratorium after the initiation of CIRP - monthly rent was agreed upon and is payable to the landlord JOML by the corporate debtor, before or during the imposition of moratorium - it was held by NCLAT that 'the Adjudicating Authority did not adjudicate on the prayer made by the RP for restoration of the possession of the said premises, which it should have done to settle the dispute early.' HELD THAT:- There are no good ground and reason to interfere with the impugned judgment; hence, the present appeals are dismissed. The Supreme Court, comprising Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Justice Sanjay Kumar, and Justice Joymalya Bagchi, issued an order condoning delay. The Court found 'no good ground and reason to interfere with the impugned judgment,' and consequently, the appeals were dismissed. All pending applications were disposed of.