Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the disallowance of input tax credit on the basis of mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A could stand without following the procedure prescribed in the binding GST circular.
Analysis: The assessment proceeded on the basis that the petitioner's input tax credit did not tally with the supplier-side reflection in GSTR-2A. The Circular F. No. CBIC-20001/2/2022-GST dated 27-12-2022 specifically addressed the situation where supplies do not get reflected in GSTR-2A because the supplier failed to file FORM GSTR-1, though the return in FORM GSTR-3B had been filed. The Circular required the discrepancy in ITC to be handled under the procedure prescribed in para 4, and the assessing authority was bound to follow that procedure while reconsidering the claim.
Conclusion: The assessment could not be sustained in its existing form and had to be redone in accordance with the Circular.
Final Conclusion: The assessment and appellate orders were set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with the prescribed GST circular.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a binding circular prescribes the procedure for dealing with an ITC mismatch arising from non-reflection in GSTR-2A, the assessing authority must follow that procedure before rejecting the credit claim.