Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether cenvat credit was admissible on the basis of "Advice of Transfer Debit Bills" issued by the Head Office; and (ii) whether the extended period of limitation could be invoked and penalty sustained against a public sector undertaking.
Issue (i): Whether cenvat credit was admissible on the basis of "Advice of Transfer Debit Bills" issued by the Head Office.
Analysis: The documents contained the particulars required under Rule 9 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and the credit was taken in connection with capital goods and services used for providing output services. The earlier decision in the appellant's own case was followed.
Conclusion: The cenvat credit was held admissible in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether the extended period of limitation could be invoked and penalty sustained against a public sector undertaking.
Analysis: The demand was raised by invoking the extended period, but the appellant being a public sector undertaking, mala fide intention was held absent. In that view, the extended period was found inapplicable, and the demand could not survive; penalty also could not be imposed.
Conclusion: The extended period of limitation was held not invokable and the penalty was not sustainable, in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded on merits and limitation, the impugned order was set aside, and the demand and penalty were held unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Cenvat credit cannot be denied when the underlying transfer debit advice contains the particulars required by the credit rules, and the extended period is not invokable absent mala fide intention.