Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were vitiated because the show-cause notices did not specify the particular limb of the charge.
Analysis: The notices issued under section 271(1)(c) read with section 274 did not identify whether the proposed penalty was for concealment of income or for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. In penalty matters, the assessee must be informed of the exact charge so that an effective defence can be raised. Where the initiating notices are vague on this foundational aspect, the defect goes to the root of the proceedings.
Conclusion: The penalty proceedings were held to be invalid and unsustainable for want of specification of the relevant limb in the show-cause notices.