TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in view of the corresponding notification reducing the pre-deposit requirement, the petitioner was entitled to deposit 10% of the disputed tax for the impugned first appellate order to remain stayed.
Analysis: The petitioner sought disposal of the writ petition on the footing that the deposit requirement applicable to the impugned appellate order stood correspondingly reduced to 10% of the disputed tax, consistent with the revised notification regime referred to before the Court.
Conclusion: The request was accepted and the petitioner was permitted to make the deposit accordingly so that the impugned order would remain stayed.
TaxTMI 
