Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the assessment dispute concerning reversal of Input Tax Credit arising from mismatch between the assessee's returns and the selling dealer's returns required remand for fresh consideration in the light of Circular No.5/2021 dated 24.02.2021.
Issue (i): Whether the assessment dispute concerning reversal of Input Tax Credit arising from mismatch between the assessee's returns and the selling dealer's returns required remand for fresh consideration in the light of Circular No.5/2021 dated 24.02.2021.
Analysis: The assessment orders pre-dated the later circular framework, and the appellate authorities had not had the benefit of the mechanism subsequently issued for matching returns and determining the correct ITC claim. In those circumstances, the dispute warranted reconsideration by the assessing authority in line with the later circular, rather than being finally concluded on the existing record.
Conclusion: The matter was remanded for de novo consideration in accordance with Circular No.5/2021 dated 24.02.2021, and the challenge by the State succeeded.
Final Conclusion: The tax cases were allowed and the ITC dispute was sent back for fresh adjudication by the assessing authority under the applicable circular framework.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a later binding procedural circular governing ITC verification has not been considered by the lower authorities, remand for fresh assessment in accordance with that circular is appropriate.