Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Select multiple courts at once.
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Supreme Court rejects petition filed 350 days late, refuses to condone delay without valid reasons</h1> The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition filed with an inordinate delay of 350 days. The Court refused to condone the delay, stating no reason existed ... LTCG - Invocation of Section 50C - transaction relating to an immovable property - assessee had purchased the subject property and took stamp duty paid in respect of that transaction into consideration - HC [2024 (2) TMI 1562 - DELHI HIGH COURT] held Section 50C of the Act on its plain language, is clearly concerned with the vendor or the seller of the property in question. The said provision can have no application to a purchaser - Delay filling SLP - HELD THAT:- We see no reason to condone the inordinate delay of 350 days in filing the Special Leave Petition. Hence, petition(s) stands dismissed on the ground of delay. The Supreme Court, in a partial bench comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Mahadevan, dismissed the Special Leave Petition due to an 'inordinate delay of 350 days' in its filing. The Court explicitly stated, 'we see no reason to condone the inordinate delay,' thereby rejecting the petition on grounds of delay. Consequently, all pending applications related thereto were disposed of.