Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order confirming the tax proposal on the basis of mismatch between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B returns, without accounting for the remittance made through debit of the electronic credit ledger, was liable to be set aside and remanded for reconsideration.
Analysis: The assessment order was found to have confirmed the entire tax proposal without granting credit for the 58% already remitted by the petitioner through debit of the electronic credit ledger. In view of this omission, the matter required fresh consideration after affording reasonable opportunity to the petitioner and taking the remittances into account.
Conclusion: The impugned assessment order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the first respondent for reconsideration after giving reasonable opportunity and considering the remittances already made.