Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether waste and scrap arising from dismantling, repair and maintenance of old and used machinery and capital goods could be treated as goods generated during the course of manufacture so as to attract duty under the tariff entry relied upon by the department.
Analysis: The show cause notices proceeded on the footing that the disputed scrap arose from dismantling of worn out machinery and from repair and maintenance of old machinery, and also recorded that the capital goods from which the scrap emerged were not credit-availing goods. The relevant section note invoked by the department was meant to cover waste and scrap arising in the course of manufacture of iron and steel products, not scrap generated by mere dismantling of unusable machinery. Scrap arising when capital goods are scrapped or dismantled after becoming unserviceable does not amount to waste and scrap generated in the course of manufacture.
Conclusion: The scrap in question was not liable to duty on the basis suggested by the department, and the demand and penalty could not be sustained.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded, the orders below were set aside, and consequential relief followed according to law.
Ratio Decidendi: Scrap arising from dismantling or scrapping of old and unusable capital goods during repair and maintenance is not manufacture-generated waste and scrap for the purpose of excise classification and duty.