Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported goods described as a ventilator used with anaesthesia apparatus were covered by the exemption under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus., dated 1-3-2002 and Notification No. 6/2006-C.E., dated 1-3-2006.
Analysis: The equipment was examined as a composite anaesthesia ventilator system. The deciding factor was whether the goods were, in substance, a ventilator used with anaesthesia apparatus or merely an anaesthesia delivery system with ventilator features. The product literature and technical material showed that the ventilator function was integral and predominant, and the machine was commercially and functionally distinct from a standalone anaesthesia apparatus. On that basis, the description in the exemption notifications was found to be satisfied.
Conclusion: The imported goods were held to be eligible for the exemption notifications and the denial of benefit was set aside.