Edible grade exemption for crude shea butter denied where imported condition, not later use, controlled notification eligibility.

Crude shea butter imported under Chapter 15 was held not to qualify as edible grade for exemption under Serial Nos. 33A or 33B of Notification No. 21/2002-Customs. The Customs House Laboratory reported the samples as unrefined shea butter other than edible grade, while the contrary opinion relied on general PFA standards rather than any specific shea butter standard. The notification was construed by reference to the condition of the goods as imported, not their possible later processing or end use, and the evidence did not show exclusive edible use. The exemption claim therefore failed and the assessment order denying the benefit was sustained.

---

---

Issues: Whether crude shea butter imported under Chapter 15 was entitled to exemption under Serial Nos. 33A or 33B of Notification No. 21/2002-Customs on the footing that it was of edible grade.

Analysis: The imported goods were admittedly in crude form. The controversy turned on whether they could be treated as edible grade for the purpose of the notification. The record showed conflicting laboratory opinions, but the Customs House Laboratory found the samples to be unrefined shea butter other than edible grade, while the Public Analyst relied only on general PFA standards and not on any specific standard for shea butter under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955. The notification did not prescribe any condition based on intended end use or on the product becoming edible after processing. The evidence also showed that the imported quantity was not entirely used for edible purposes and that shea butter had other uses as well. The later FSSAI specification indicating a maximum free fatty acid content for unrefined shea butter was also relied upon as supporting the view that the samples, with much higher FFA content, could not be treated as edible grade.

Conclusion: The crude shea butter was not proved to be of edible grade and was not eligible for exemption under Serial Nos. 33A or 33B of Notification No. 21/2002-Customs.

Final Conclusion: The exemption claim failed, and the assessment order disallowing the benefit was sustained.

Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption notification grants benefit only to crude or refined goods of edible grade, the entitlement must be determined on the condition of the goods as imported and not on their possible later use or processing, especially when no such end-use condition is expressly provided in the notification.

---