Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ petition challenging the assessment order was liable to be entertained despite being filed beyond the statutory period and in the face of the petitioner's admitted tax liability.
Analysis: The challenge was raised long after the assessment order. The order recorded that the petitioner had replied to the notices and had accepted the defect, acknowledging the tax payable. The Court also noted a mismatch between the turnover reported in GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, resulting in a short payment of tax. In these circumstances, no ground was made out to interfere with the assessment order.
Conclusion: The writ petition was not entertainable and stood dismissed on the ground of laches as well as the petitioner's admission of tax liability.