Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether lubricants and lubrication preparations imported and declared as "not for retail sale" and meant for industrial consumers could be subjected to MRP-based assessment for additional duty of customs under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with the relevant notification.
Analysis: The imported goods were declared in the Bills of Entry as not meant for retail sale, and the packages also described them as for industrial use only. The Tribunal applied the settled position that MRP-based assessment under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is attracted only when the goods are required to bear retail sale price under the Legal Metrology regime and are intended for retail sale. Goods meant for industrial consumers or institutional consumers do not fall within that category. Since the record showed clearance and sale to industrial consumers directly or through distributors or stockists, the absence of retail-sale character made revision of the declared price irrelevant for valuation under the MRP method.
Conclusion: The goods were not liable to MRP-based assessment and the demand could not be sustained.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods expressly meant for industrial or institutional consumers and not intended for retail sale are outside the ambit of MRP-based assessment under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944.