Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the activities undertaken on imported automobile parts at the National Part Centre and depots, including testing, quality inspection, packing, repacking, labelling and consolidation into master cartons, amounted to deemed manufacture under the Central Excise Act, 1944, with the result that the Revenue's demand for reversal of Cenvat credit could not be sustained.
Analysis: The imported and locally procured automobile parts were received in packed condition, subjected to inspection and quality checks, and then consolidated, repacked and affixed with labels showing part number, quantity, country of origin and other particulars before dispatch. The verification report of the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner and the contemporaneous records supported the finding that the goods were processed in a manner covered by the statutory definition of manufacture. The Revenue did not adduce independent evidence to displace those findings or to show that the activities were merely incidental and did not amount to manufacture.
Conclusion: The activities fell within the scope of deemed manufacture under Section 2(f)(iii) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where imported goods covered by the Third Schedule are packed or repacked in unit containers, labelled, or otherwise treated to render them marketable, the process constitutes deemed manufacture for central excise purposes.