Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to a writ of mandamus for provisional release of imported goods and whether the request should be considered by the customs authorities on merits in the light of the relevant statutory provisions and the Navshakti ruling.
Analysis: The relief was not finally adjudicated on merits. The Court recorded that the petitioner was willing to submit a fresh representation seeking provisional release, while the respondents stated that the earlier representation was directed towards final assessment. The Court declined to express any opinion on the merits and directed the respondents to consider the fresh representation on merits and in accordance with law, with due regard to the cited decisions and Regulation 2 of the Customs (Provisional Duty Assessment) Regulations, 2011.
Outcome: The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to submit a fresh representation within one week and for the respondents to pass final orders within four weeks thereafter.