2025 (6) TMI 1216 - AT - Income Tax

Section 80JJAA deduction allowed despite 11-day delay in filing Form-10DA audit report when available before return processing

M/s. High Precision Engineering Composites Private Limited Versus Income Tax Officer Ward 4 (1) Hyderabad

The ITAT Hyderabad allowed deduction u/s 80JJAA despite an 11-day delay in filing Form-10DA audit report. The assessee filed both the return and audit ... Deduction u/s 80JJAA - due to delay of 11 days in filing the audit report in Form-10DA, but the same was filed much before the CPC processed the return u/s 143(1) - DR submitted that the assessee ought to have applied for condonation of delay in filing the audit report in Form 10DA as per the provisions of section 119(2)(b) HELD THAT:- Due date of filing of the return of income u/s 139(1) of the Act was 31/10/2023 and therefore, the assessee filed the return of income as well as the audit report in Form 10DA within the due date of filing the return of income u/s 139(1) of the I.T. Act, 1961, though the assessee has accepted that there is a delay in filing the audit report in Form-10DA by considering the due date of filing the audit report as 30/09/2023. When the report was filed and was available with the CPC before passing the impugned order u/s 143(1), then the delay of 11 days in filing the audit report cannot be a ground for denial of deduction u/s 80JJAA of the Act. This issue has been considered by this Tribunal as well as by the Hon'ble High Courts which have been relied upon by the assessee. See PPS Motors (P) Ltd vs. Dy.CIT [2025 (2) TMI 1196 - ITAT HYDERABAD]. Thus, to maintain the rule of consistency, we direct the Assessing Officer to allow the claim of the assessee u/s 80JJAA of the Act by considering the report in Form-10DA filed by the assessee. The core legal question considered in this appeal is whether the deduction claimed under section 80JJAA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 can be disallowed solely on the ground of a delay of 11 days in filing the audit report in Form 10DA, when the return of income and the audit report were both filed within the due date for filing the return under section 139(1), and the audit report was submitted before the processing of the return under section 143(1).Specifically, the issues considered include:Whether the delay in filing Form 10DA beyond the prescribed due date for the audit report (30/09/2023) but within the due date for filing the return (31/10/2023) justifies denial of deduction under section 80JJAA.Whether filing Form 10DA before the processing of the return under section 143(1) suffices for compliance, despite the initial delay.The applicability and necessity of seeking condonation of delay under section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act for late filing of Form 10DA.The legal effect of procedural non-compliance (delay in filing Form 10DA) on the substantive right to claim deduction under section 80JJAA.Regarding the first issue, the relevant legal framework includes section 80JJAA of the Income Tax Act, which grants deduction for employment generation subject to conditions including filing of a tax audit report in Form 10DA. Rule 19AB prescribes the manner and time for filing the audit report. Section 119(2)(b) empowers the tax authorities to condone delay in compliance of procedural requirements. Precedents cited by the assessee include decisions from various ITAT Benches and High Courts, notably the Gujarat High Court's ruling in Association of Indian Panelboard Manufacturer, which held that the requirement of furnishing the audit report is mandatory but procedural, and delay in filing should not defeat the substantive right if the report is eventually filed before assessment completion. The Supreme Court decision in CIT vs. G.M. Knitting Industries was also referenced to support this principle.The Court interpreted these provisions and precedents to mean that the delay of 11 days in filing Form 10DA, when the return and audit report were both filed within the due date for filing the return under section 139(1), and the audit report was available before the processing of the return under section 143(1), does not justify denial of the deduction. The Court emphasized that the procedural lapse of delay should not override the substantive compliance and entitlement to deduction.Key evidence included the dates of filing: the return and Form 10DA were filed on 11/10/2023, within the due date for filing the return (31/10/2023) but after the due date for filing the audit report (30/09/2023). The CPC processed the return on 27/05/2024 and disallowed the deduction solely on the ground of delay. The assessee filed a rectification application under section 154, which was rejected. The assessee relied on multiple decisions from coordinate Benches of the Tribunal supporting the view that late filing of Form 10DA within the return filing due date and before assessment completion suffices for claiming deduction.In applying the law to facts, the Court noted the consistency in judicial approach that procedural delays in filing Form 10DA should not defeat the substantive right to claim deduction under section 80JJAA if the report is filed before assessment completion. The Court observed that the assessee's filing of Form 10DA before processing under section 143(1) constitutes sufficient compliance. The Court also noted that the assessee did not seek condonation of delay under section 119(2)(b), but held that this procedural lapse should not result in denial of deduction when the report was ultimately filed within the return filing due date and before assessment completion.The Court treated the Revenue's argument that condonation of delay was necessary as subordinate to the principle that substantive compliance is paramount. The Court relied on the consistent approach of coordinate Benches and High Courts that have allowed deduction in similar circumstances, emphasizing the need to avoid harsh consequences for minor procedural delays.The Court concluded that the disallowance of deduction under section 80JJAA solely on the ground of delay in filing Form 10DA was not justified. The matter was remanded to the Assessing Officer to allow the deduction by considering the belatedly filed Form 10DA.Significant holdings include the following verbatim reasoning from the Tribunal:'Although the requirement of furnishing report was mandatory, filing thereof is a procedural aspect... Form-10DA filed belatedly on 17/10/2023 by assessee should have been considered by the authorities for the purpose of deduction U/s. 80JJAA of the Act... the fact remains that as on the date of Intimation U/s.143(1) of the Act, Form- 10DA is available on record... We are of the considered opinion that Form-10DA filed belatedly should have been considered.'Core principles established are:The requirement to file Form 10DA is mandatory but procedural, and delay in filing should not defeat substantive entitlement if the report is filed before assessment completion.Filing Form 10DA within the due date for filing the return under section 139(1), even if delayed beyond the audit report due date, suffices for claiming deduction under section 80JJAA.Denial of deduction solely on the ground of delay in filing Form 10DA is not justified if the report is filed before processing of the return under section 143(1).Condonation of delay under section 119(2)(b) is not mandatory where the audit report is filed before assessment completion and the return is filed within the due date.Final determinations on the issue are that the disallowance of deduction under section 80JJAA on the ground of delay in filing Form 10DA is set aside, and the matter is remanded for allowing the deduction by considering the duly filed Form 10DA. The appeal is allowed accordingly.