TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal upholds penalty under Finance Act, restores original amount, setting aside reduced penalty.</h1> <h3>COMMR. OF C. EX., RAJKOT Versus BAJRANGBALI COKE INDUS. PVT. LTD.</h3> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, upheld the penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act in the case of Revenue v. Respondent, restoring the ... Penalty- Commissioner (Appeals) reduced penalty in the light of the provisions of Section 80 of the act. Held that- Once the provisions of Section 76 stand invoked against the assessee, the penalties have to be posed in terms of the said section and cannot be lowered. Thus the revenue appeal allowed. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, in the case of Revenue vs. Respondent, upheld penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, restoring the original penalty amount of Rs. 46,217/- and setting aside the reduction to Rs. 10,000/ by the Commissioner (Appeals). The Tribunal found Section 80 of the Finance Act not applicable, leading to the restoration of the original penalty amount.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
