Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether pre-deposit of the disputed service tax demand should be waived pending appeal in view of the assessee's claim to exemption under Notification No. 12/2003 dated 20-6-2003 and the material placed on record.
Analysis: The disputed demand arose from works contract receipts where the assessee claimed that the value of goods and materials used was supported by documentary evidence and was therefore outside the service tax base to that extent. The Tribunal noted that service tax is intended to tax only the service element and not sale of goods, and that the notification requires documentary proof specifically indicating the goods and materials. It found that the adjudicating authority had not properly examined the materials and accounts placed before it and had proceeded mechanically in denying the benefit of the notification and confirming the demand.
Conclusion: The assessee had made out a prima facie case for interim protection, and waiver of pre-deposit during the pendency of the appeal was granted.