Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reassessment notice issued under section 148 was valid when approval was obtained from the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax instead of the authority required under section 151 for a notice issued after three years from the end of the relevant assessment year.
Analysis: The appeal concerned reassessment for assessment year 2016-17 through notice dated 24.08.2022. The notice itself showed prior approval of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax. The applicable approval requirement, as noted in the order, was that prior sanction had to be obtained from the higher authority prescribed under section 151 where more than three years had elapsed from the end of the relevant assessment year. Since the notice was issued with approval of the Principal Commissioner rather than the prescribed authority, the reopening was held to suffer from a jurisdictional defect. Once the reassessment notice failed on this legal ground, the merits of the addition did not survive for adjudication.
Conclusion: The reassessment notice was held invalid and the consequent proceedings were treated as void ab initio, in favour of the assessee.