Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the pre-deposit required under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was validly made through debit in the electronic credit ledger using DRC-03 before 28.10.2022, and whether rejection of the appeal as non-maintainable for want of pre-deposit was sustainable.
Analysis: The pre-deposit of 7.5% of the adjudged dues was made on 04.06.2021 by debit from the electronic credit ledger. The governing view applied was that such debit through DRC-03, if made before 28.10.2022, constitutes valid compliance with the requirement of Section 35F. On that basis, the earlier finding that the appeal was not maintainable for non-compliance with pre-deposit could not stand.
Conclusion: The mandatory pre-deposit was held to be validly made, and the rejection of the appeal for want of pre-deposit was set aside.
Final Conclusion: The matter was sent back for decision on merits after acceptance of the pre-deposit compliance.
Ratio Decidendi: Debit in the electronic credit ledger through DRC-03 made before 28.10.2022 satisfies the statutory requirement of pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944.