Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest paid by the firm on amounts deposited by minors admitted to the benefits of a partnership was includible in the assessee's income under section 16(3)(a)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The distinction between capital contributed under the partnership terms and separate deposits or loans made by the minors was material. The partnership deed required only a fixed capital contribution, and the assessee's case was that the excess sums were independent deposits, not additional capital. The revenue did not establish that the excess amounts represented accumulated profits or that they were required capital contributions. On the facts, the interest was paid on deposits or loans made independently of the minors' admission to the benefits of the partnership, and the necessary connection with such admission was not shown.
Conclusion: The interest on the minors' excess deposits was not includible in the assessee's income under section 16(3)(a)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, and the answer was in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Interest earned by a minor admitted to the benefits of a partnership is includible in the assessee's income only when a direct or indirect nexus is shown between that receipt and the minor's admission to the partnership; interest on independent deposits or loans, absent such nexus, is not so includible.