1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Assessee's Claim for Refund Partially Disallowed by Appellate Tribunal</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai partly disallowed the assessee's claim for refund of unused input service tax credit as the input services were not ... Refund- The assesseeβs claim for refund of unused input service tax credit availed for rendering output service exported by them has been partly disallowed to the extent of Rs.28,432/- and Rs.26,927/-. The reason for holding that credit is not admissible is that input services are not directly related to the output service provided by the assessees. Held that- in the light of the decision of KBACE Tech Pvt. Ltd. Vs CCE & ST, Bangalore [2010 (18) STR 281], set aside the impugned orders and remit the case to the adjudicating authority to decide afresh. The appeals are thus allowed by way of remand. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai partly disallowed the assessee's claim for refund of unused input service tax credit. The reason was that the input services were not directly related to the output service provided by the assessees. Refund is admissible only on services consumed for providing output services. The case was remanded to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision in light of the precedent. The appeals were allowed by way of remand.