Builder Wins Service Tax Exemption for Construction Services Predating 2010 Taxation Rules Under Composite Works Contract

The SC/Tribunal ruled that the service tax demand against the builder for the period 16.06.2005 to 31.12.2005 was unsustainable. Prior to 01.07.2010, 'Construction of Complex Services' was not taxable. The court found the appellant's construction services fell under composite works contracts or self-service, which were exempt from service tax during the specified period. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief.

---

---

1. ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED

The core legal question considered in this appeal is whether the service tax demand raised under the category of 'Construction of Complex Services' against the appellant, a builder providing construction services, is sustainable for the period from 16.06.2005 to 31.12.2005. Specifically, the Tribunal examined:

• Whether the appellant's activity of constructing and selling undivided shares of property, coupled with execution of construction agreements, falls within the taxable category of 'Construction of Complex Services' for the relevant period.
• The applicability and interpretation of the service tax provisions and relevant circulars governing the levy of service tax on construction services prior to 01.07.2010.
• Whether the demand for service tax amounting to Rs.8,31,082/- for the said period is legally sustainable.

2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

Issue: Sustainability of Service Tax Demand under 'Construction of Complex Services' for the period 16.06.2005 to 31.12.2005

Relevant Legal Framework and Precedents:

The Tribunal referred to the following key legal authorities and circulars:

• The judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of CCE & C, Kerala vs. Larsen & Toubro Ltd., which clarified the taxability of construction services and composite contracts under service tax law.
• Circular No.108/2/2009-ST dated 29.01.2009 issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC), which clarified the applicability of service tax on construction services prior to 01.07.2010.
• Decisions of various Tribunals, including Modi Ventures vs. The Commissioner of Central Tax, Kolla Developers & Builders vs. CCE & ST, and Krishna Homes vs. CCE, which dealt with similar issues of service tax liability on construction services.

Court's Interpretation and Reasoning:

The Tribunal analyzed the issue in light of the above authorities and noted the following key points:

• Prior to 01.07.2010, the levy of service tax on 'Construction of Complex Services' was not applicable as per the explanation inserted on that date. The CBEC Circular dated 29.01.2009 explicitly clarified that no service tax could be levied under this category before 01.07.2010.
• The Supreme Court's ruling in Larsen & Toubro Ltd. established that composite works contracts prior to 01.06.2007 were not subject to service tax.
• Between 01.06.2007 and 30.06.2010, the taxability depended on whether the contract was composite or a service simpliciter, and whether the service was rendered prior to issuance of completion certificate and transfer of property. Services rendered before completion certificate issuance were considered self-service and not taxable.
• Services rendered for the personal use of the service recipient, such as construction of residential flats for own use, were excluded from service tax liability.

Key Evidence and Findings:

The adjudicating authority had found that the appellant sold undivided shares of property and executed separate construction agreements with buyers, categorizing the activity under 'Construction of Complex Services'. However, the appellant's representatives contended that the service tax demand was not sustainable given the timeline and nature of the services rendered.

Application of Law to Facts:

Applying the legal principles and precedents, the Tribunal concluded that the demand for service tax for the period 16.06.2005 to 31.12.2005 was not sustainable because:

• The service tax provisions for 'Construction of Complex Services' were not applicable prior to 01.07.2010.
• The appellant's activity fell within the scope of composite works contracts or self-service prior to completion certificate issuance, which were not taxable under service tax law during the relevant period.

Treatment of Competing Arguments:

The Revenue's representative admitted that the Circular dated 29.01.2009, issued after the impugned order, covered the issue and supported the appellant's position. The appellant relied on the Supreme Court judgment and Tribunal decisions to argue against the tax demand. The Tribunal found the appellant's arguments persuasive and consistent with the legal framework.

Conclusions:

The Tribunal held that the service tax demand confirmed by the adjudicating authority was unsustainable and allowed the appeal with consequential relief.

3. SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS

The Tribunal's crucial legal reasoning is encapsulated in the following verbatim extract from the decision in Modi Ventures (supra):

"7. Thus, as far as service tax under 'construction of complex services' is concerned, prior to 01.07.2010 (when the explanation was inserted), no tax could be levied. This was also clarified by the CBEC in Circular No. 108/2/2009/ST dated 29.01.2009. The question before the Tribunal Principal Bench in the case of Krishna Homes Vs CCE Bhopal [2014 (34) STR 881(Tri-Del)] was whether this limitation on taxation prior to 01.07.2010 also extends to cases where such services were rendered not as 'construction of complex services' but as 'works contract services' and it was answered in affirmative. To sum up, as far as construction of residential complex by builders are concerned:

(i) Prior to 1-6-2007, if it is a composite works contract, no Service Tax is leviable in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Larsen & Toubro (supra).
(ii) After 1-6-2007, it is chargeable under 'works contract' if it is a composite contract and under 'construction of complex services' if it is a service simpliciter.
(iii) However, after 1-6-2007 but prior to 1-7-2010, whether it is a service simpliciter or a works contract, if the service is rendered prior to issue of completion certificate and transfer to the buyer, it is not taxable the service being in the nature of self service.
(iv) Further, whenever the service is rendered for completion or construction of a flat for personal use of the service recipient, no Service Tax is payable in view of the exclusion in the definition of residential complex service.
(v) After 1-7-2010, Service Tax is chargeable under the head of 'construction of complex services' if it is service simpliciter and under 'works contract service' if it is a composite works contract unless it is for personal use of the service recipient."

The Tribunal thus established the core principles governing the taxability of construction services during the relevant period and concluded that the demand for service tax against the appellant for the period 16.06.2005 to 31.12.2005 was not legally sustainable.

---