Supreme Court Rejects Excise Appeal After 440-Day Delay, Finds No Compelling Justification for Late Filing SC dismissed excise appeal due to 440-day delay in filing, finding no satisfactory explanation from appellant. The court also found no merit to interfere ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Supreme Court Rejects Excise Appeal After 440-Day Delay, Finds No Compelling Justification for Late Filing
SC dismissed excise appeal due to 440-day delay in filing, finding no satisfactory explanation from appellant. The court also found no merit to interfere with the original tribunal order. The appeal was rejected both on procedural grounds of delay and substantive merits, with all pending applications disposed of accordingly.
The Supreme Court of India, through Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan, dismissed the appeal in Excise Appeal No. 75247 of 2018 due to a "gross delay of 440 days" in filing, which was "not satisfactorily explained" by the appellant. Additionally, the Court found no merit to interfere with the impugned order dated 21.11.2023 passed by the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata. The appeal was dismissed both "on the ground of delay as well as on merits," and all pending applications were disposed of.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
