Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether parallel proceedings under the GST enactments could be continued by different authorities for the same cause, and what consequential directions should follow regarding the petitioner's premises and the investigation.
Analysis: The proceedings had already been initiated by the Central Goods and Services Tax authority under Section 67 of the GST enactments. In that situation, the State tax authority could not independently proceed in parallel on the same cause for the same year. The proper course was to treat the Central authority as the competent authority to carry the matter forward under Section 70, while permitting the State to assist without commencing independent proceedings. The petitioner was also given liberty to seek de-sealing before the concerned respondent, and the seals were directed to be handed over so that the matter could proceed in accordance with law.
Conclusion: Parallel proceedings by the State authority were not permitted, and the Central Goods and Services Tax authority alone was to proceed with the matter, with the State confined to assistance. The petitioner was also granted liberty to seek de-sealing of the premises in accordance with law.