Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Tax Credit Claim Upheld: Authorities Must Thoroughly Verify Supplier Transactions Before Denying Input Tax Credit Refunds
HC granted petition challenging denial of Input Tax Credit (ITC) due to supplier's retrospective GST registration cancellation. Court found insufficient examination of transaction genuineness by tax authorities. Ordered matter remanded for fresh adjudication, emphasizing need to verify transaction authenticity before denying ITC claims.
The Himachal Pradesh High Court, through Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, granted the petition seeking quashing of impugned orders denying Input Tax Credit (ITC) to the petitioner. The petitioner challenged orders dated 10.01.2025 and 31.03.2024 issued by Respondents No. 3 and 4, which denied ITC on the sole ground that the supplier's GST registration was cancelled retrospectively. The Court noted that neither the Assessing Officer nor the Appellate Authority examined the genuineness of the transaction before issuing a notice under Section 16(2) of the CGST Act. Emphasizing the need to "consider the genuineness of the transaction" and "examine all the relevant documents," the Court set aside the impugned orders and remanded the matter to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh adjudication. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.