Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the importer was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 32/2005-Cus. under the Target Plus Scheme notwithstanding that the imported plastic granules were not physically consumed in the export goods and were converted through job workers.
Analysis: The scheme was treated as a post-export incentive intended to reward export performance, and not as a scheme imposing a further export obligation linked to the imported inputs. The clarified position of the DGFT was relied upon to show that conversion of imported inputs through a jobbing unit satisfies the actual user requirement, and that sale of resultant products is permissible. Paragraph 3.7.6 of the Foreign Trade Policy 2004-2009 and Paragraph 3.2.5(II) of the Handbook of Procedures 2004-2009 were read as requiring only a broad nexus between the imported goods and the export product group, not physical incorporation of the imported goods in the very goods exported. The record did not show any legal infirmity in the original authority's view that the conditions of the notification were fulfilled.
Conclusion: The benefit of the Target Plus Scheme was rightly extended, and the Revenue had no basis to disturb the exemption.
Ratio Decidendi: Under the Target Plus Scheme, the importer need only establish broad nexus and own use within the relevant product group; physical use of the imported inputs in the exact export product is not a mandatory condition.