TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tax Authorities Must Reconsider GST Registration Cancellation After Petitioner Pays Outstanding Dues, Restoring Compliance Pathway</h1> <h3>M/s. Sarita Kerketta Versus Superintendent, CGST and Central Excise, Phulbani Circle, Kandhamal</h3> HC allowed petitioner's challenge to GST registration cancellation, directing tax authorities to reconsider revocation application upon payment of all ... Cancellation of client’s registration under Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - client (petitioner) is ready and willing to pay the tax, interest, late fee, penalty and any other sum required to be paid - HELD THAT:- Reliance placed in the case of M/S. MOHANTY ENTERPRISES VERSUS THE COMMISSIONER, CT & GST, ODISHA, CUTTACK AND OTHERS [2022 (11) TMI 1521 - ORISSA HIGH COURT] where it was held that 'the delay in Petitioner’s invoking the proviso to Rule 23 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules (OGST Rules) is condoned and it is directed that subject to the Petitioner depositing all the taxes, interest, late fee, penalty etc., due and complying with other formalities, the Petitioner’s application for revocation will be considered in accordance with law.' Petition disposed off. The Orissa High Court, through Acting Chief Justice Arindam Sinha and Justice M.S. Sahoo, addressed a challenge to a show cause notice dated 13th October 2022 and an order dated 10th November 2022 cancelling the appellant's registration under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The appellant, represented by Miss Itishree Tripathy, sought acceptance of returns upon payment of all due tax, interest, late fee, and penalty. Relying on a coordinate Bench's order in M/s. Mohanty Enterprises v. Commissioner, CT & GST, Odisha (W.P.(C) no.30374 of 2022), the Court noted the precedent that 'the delay in Petitioner's invoking the proviso to Rule 23 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules (OGST Rules) is condoned' provided all dues are paid and formalities complied with. Applying the same reasoning, the Court directed that the petitioner's application for revocation be considered in accordance with law, emphasizing relief 'in the interest of revenue.' The writ petition was accordingly disposed of.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
