Condonation of delay and partial relief on construction-cost disallowance granted after evidentiary scrutiny of improvement claims.

Delay in filing the appeal was condoned because the Tribunal accepted the assessee's explanation based on non-resident status, medical emergencies, and difficulty in using the e-portal. On the quantum issues, the disallowance relating to cost of construction was sustained only to the extent supported by lack of documentary evidence, while the disallowance for cost of improvement was deleted. The assessee therefore obtained partial relief, and the additions were reduced accordingly.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the delay in filing the appeal deserved condonation. (ii) Whether the additions/disallowances made on account of cost of construction and cost of improvement required interference.

Issue (i): Whether the delay in filing the appeal deserved condonation.

Analysis: The appeal was filed belatedly, and the explanation placed before the Tribunal referred to the assessee's non-resident status, medical emergencies, and difficulties in filing through the e-portal.

Conclusion: The delay was condoned.

Issue (ii): Whether the additions/disallowances made on account of cost of construction and cost of improvement required interference.

Analysis: The disallowance of cost of construction was made for want of documentary support. The Tribunal granted partial relief by deleting the disallowance relating to cost of improvement and restricting the disallowance on account of cost of construction to a lesser sum.

Conclusion: The assessee was granted partial relief and the additions were reduced.

Final Conclusion: The appeal was disposed of by granting partial relief to the assessee on the quantum additions.

---