Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment initiated beyond four years from the end of the relevant assessment year was valid in the absence of any failure by the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts.
Analysis: The reopening was made after expiry of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year, attracting the first proviso to section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The record showed that the original return and the material facts relating to the transaction were already part of the earlier assessment proceedings, and there was no failure by the assessee to make full and true disclosure. The reasons recorded for reopening had to be tested on their own terms and could not be supplemented by extraneous material. On that basis, the statutory condition for reopening beyond four years was not satisfied.
Conclusion: The reassessment proceedings were invalid and were quashed in favour of the assessee.