Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether centrifugal power driven pumps of horizontal and vertical type used primarily for handling water were entitled to the concessional duty benefit under Notification No. 10/2006-C.E. dated 01.03.2006 and Notification No. 12/2012-C.E. dated 17.03.2012, and whether the demand, interest and penalty could therefore be sustained.
Analysis: The relevant tariff entry and the exemption entry were read together. The goods manufactured by the appellant fell within Tariff Heading 8413 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, and the exemption at Sl. No. 235 of Notification No. 12/2012-C.E. covered power driven pumps primarily designed for handling water, including centrifugal pumps of horizontal and vertical type. The classification dispute did not defeat the benefit because, on either classification suggested in the record, the goods remained pumps primarily designed for handling water and were covered by the notification. Once the duty demand was held unsustainable, interest and penalty could not survive.
Conclusion: The concessional notification benefit was available to the appellant, and the duty demand, interest and penalty were not sustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the goods are centrifugal pumps primarily designed for handling water and fall within the notified tariff coverage, exemption cannot be denied merely on the basis of the tariff entry suggested by the Revenue if the notification itself embraces the goods by description.