Block assessment additions need incriminating search material; a valuation report alone cannot sustain alleged undisclosed investment.

In block assessment, an addition for alleged undisclosed investment in property could not be sustained where the search yielded no incriminating material and the investment had already been disclosed in the return and accepted in regular assessment under section 143(3). The Tribunal applied the principle that block assessment must be based on evidence found during search or material directly relatable to such evidence, and held that a District Valuation Officer's report alone was insufficient to justify the addition. The addition was therefore not sustainable in block assessment.

---

---

Issues: Whether, in block assessment proceedings, an addition for alleged undisclosed investment in property could be sustained on the basis of a valuation report when no incriminating material was found during search and the investment had already been disclosed and accepted in assessment under section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: The block period concerned was April 1, 1996 to October 4, 2002. The investment in the property had been declared in the return before the search and was accepted in the regular assessment under section 143(3) after the search. No material was found during the search to show any unaccounted investment. On these facts, the Tribunal held that block assessment could rest only on evidence found during search or material relatable to such evidence, and that the valuation report of the District Valuation Officer could not by itself justify the addition.

Conclusion: The addition was not sustainable in block assessment and the appeal failed.

---