2025 (5) TMI 1712 - AT - Income Tax

Excise duty exclusion from turnover calculation allowed following Lakshmi Machine Works precedent for threshold determination

ITAT Kolkata allowed the assessee's appeal regarding excise duty exclusion from turnover calculation. Following the SC precedent in Lakshmi Machine Works, ... Excise duty exclusion/inclusion in calculation of turnover - HED THAT:- We find that the present case is squarely covered by the decision of LAKSHMI MACHINE WORKS [2007 (4) TMI 202 - SUPREME COURT] as in the instant case also after including the amount of excise duty the turnover of the company exceeds of Rs. 250 crores. When the excise duty has been reduced the turnover the case below of 250 crores. Hence we find substance in the argument of assessee. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee has been allowed. The calculation made by the assessee are found to be substantially correct, order passed by the AO confirmed by the Ld. CIT(A) in which the AO has rejected the rectification petition are hereby set aside. 1. ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDEREDThe core legal questions considered by the Tribunal are:Whether excise duty should be included or excluded in the computation of turnover for determining the applicability of the lower corporate tax rate of 25% under the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2019-20.Whether the turnover of the assessee for the financial year 2016-17 exceeded Rs. 250 crores when excise duty is excluded, thereby attracting the higher tax rate of 30% instead of 25%.Whether the rectification petition filed under section 154 of the Income Tax Act challenging the tax rate applied by the Assessing Officer (AO) should have been allowed.Interpretation and application of relevant precedents regarding the inclusion or exclusion of excise duty and sales tax in turnover for tax computation purposes.2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSISIssue 1: Inclusion or Exclusion of Excise Duty in Computation of Turnover for Tax Rate ApplicabilityRelevant Legal Framework and Precedents: The applicable provision relates to the tax rate for domestic companies under the Income Tax Act for AY 2019-20, where companies with turnover or gross receipts not exceeding Rs. 250 crores in the previous year are eligible for a reduced tax rate of 25%. The turnover calculation is thus critical. Section 145A of the Income Tax Act provides for valuation of stock and other items including excise duty. However, the issue is whether excise duty forms part of turnover for the purpose of determining eligibility for the lower tax rate.Several judicial precedents were cited by the assessee:Hon'ble Supreme Court in CIT vs. Laxmi Machine Works (2007) held that excise duty and sales tax cannot form part of total turnover for computing deductions under section 80HHC.Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in CIT vs. Kurlon Ltd. (2011) held that indirect taxes such as excise duty and sales tax do not constitute turnover and must be excluded.Hon'ble Madras High Court in CIT vs. Wheels India Ltd. (2005) held similarly that excise duty and sales tax should be excluded from turnover for computing deductions.ITAT Kolkata in ACIT vs. Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. (2018) also supports exclusion of excise duty from turnover.Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The Tribunal analyzed the turnover figures as per the audited financial statements of the assessee for FY 2016-17. The gross revenue from operations was Rs. 250.81 crores, from which excise duty of Rs. 24.32 crores was deducted, resulting in net revenue from operations of Rs. 226.49 crores. The Tribunal noted that the AO and CIT(A) had included excise duty in turnover, resulting in a figure exceeding Rs. 250 crores, thus applying the higher tax rate of 30%. The Tribunal examined the precedents cited and found that the Supreme Court and High Courts have consistently held that excise duty is an indirect tax and should be excluded from turnover for such computations.Key Evidence and Findings: The audited profit and loss account of the assessee for FY 2016-17 was relied upon as authoritative evidence of turnover figures. The Tribunal accepted the net turnover figure excluding excise duty as Rs. 226.49 crores, which is below the Rs. 250 crore threshold.Application of Law to Facts: Applying the legal principle from the precedents, excise duty must be excluded from turnover. Therefore, the turnover of the assessee is below Rs. 250 crores, entitling it to the lower tax rate of 25% under the Income Tax Act for AY 2019-20.Treatment of Competing Arguments: The Revenue argued that excise duty should be included, relying on the AO and CIT(A) orders. However, the Tribunal found the Revenue's position contrary to binding judicial precedents. The Tribunal gave precedence to the authoritative rulings of the Supreme Court and High Courts over the AO's and CIT(A)'s approach.Conclusion: Excise duty must be excluded in computing turnover for determining the tax rate applicability. The turnover of the assessee is below Rs. 250 crores, and the lower tax rate of 25% applies.Issue 2: Validity of Rejection of Rectification Petition Under Section 154Relevant Legal Framework: Section 154 of the Income Tax Act allows rectification of mistakes apparent from the record. The assessee filed a rectification petition challenging the application of the 30% tax rate instead of 25%, based on the turnover calculation excluding excise duty.Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The Tribunal found that the AO's rejection of the rectification petition was based on the incorrect premise that turnover exceeded Rs. 250 crores inclusive of excise duty. Since the turnover excluding excise duty is below the threshold, the AO's rejection was erroneous.Key Evidence and Findings: The turnover figures from audited accounts and the legal precedents supporting exclusion of excise duty were key to this finding.Application of Law to Facts: The rectification petition was rightly filed to correct the tax rate applied. The Tribunal held that the AO should have allowed the rectification petition as the mistake was apparent from the record.Treatment of Competing Arguments: The Revenue's opposition to rectification was rejected on the basis of legal principles and evidence.Conclusion: The AO's rejection of the rectification petition was not justified and is set aside.3. SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGSThe Tribunal held:'The Hon'ble Apex Court in CIT vs. Laxmi Machine Works has held that sales tax and excise duty cannot form part of total turnover of the assessee.''The turnover of the assessee company for FY 2016-17 excluding excise duty is Rs. 226.49 crores, which is below Rs. 250 crores threshold, entitling the assessee to the lower tax rate of 25%.''The rectification petition filed under section 154 was wrongly rejected by the AO and CIT(A) on the incorrect ground that turnover exceeded Rs. 250 crores.''Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee is allowed, and the order confirming the higher tax rate is set aside.'